IELTS class 02- Write a full essay - Should universities be available to only good students?

Mình gửi bài tập:

Agree with “only good students study at the university”
Because:
- Some students are not keep up with teaching pace -> worry and stress -> reduce learning results -> drop out university.
- Teaching more effectively when students have the same level.
- Teaching equipment are limited -> they should be equip for a small number of students.
- Saving a lot of money for less competent students.
- They are likely to have different ways to pursue their career passion in stead of high level education.

It has become more common that many universities have been opened to encourage all people to participate in the higher education. Some people argue that everyone should learn in the university while others think that only highly qualified students deserve to study at the college. This essay is going to be discussed on both views of the issue.
People who favor a more widespread high level education believe that all students could gain degrees. However, statistics have shown that only about 60 percent of students who enter the university get college degree within 4 years, and the number of students dropping-out of universities is quite a significant number. Some students are not able to keep up with the teaching pace of lectures, so they become worried and stressful. This leads to their poor learning results. Moreover, if there are only good students in the class, the lecturers will teach more effectively because they do not need to spend much time for explaining the lessons to slower students in their classes.
In addition, teaching equipment of universities such as computers, projectors and even laboratory are limited, so they can only equip for a small number of students. Furthermore, there is a problem of finance. Limiting the number of students helps save a lot of money because less competent students may not be able to graduate from college. On the other hand, we should not worry much about the life of less competent students because people have different ways to pursue their career passion. For example, in my country, if a person who have just graduated from high school fails the university entrance examination, they are encouraged to choose a vocational school.
To conclude, universalizing higher education seems like a good idea, but it is not realistic. Limiting college level to only good students can benefit students, universities, as well as the society.

Agree with "University should be available for only good students"
Because:
- Universities provide student with more complicated knowledge -> Good students will find it easier to absorb as well as make use of them while bad students would find difficulty in doing so.

- University's entrance is like a challenge which should be rewarded for only good students -> Encourage every study to work hard to earn their way into universities.

- Our society needs not only professional lawyers, businessmen or accountants but we also need professional builders, workers and repairmen -> Those who are not good enough to enter university should go to vocational schools or training centers in order to secure their careers as well as to support the society in the best ways they are possible of.

Essay:

Nowadays a majority of students, irrespective of their study records, want to enter universities. However, I personally think that not every student would be suitable for university and this should be a place for only good students.

Universities provide students with more complicated and intensive knowledge that in order archive, students should have had a certain amount of base knowledge. While bad student who have insufficient knowledge would find it hard and depressed to keep up with the lectures, good students, in contrary, would know how to absorb this knowledge and make every use of them. Furthermore, the entrance to a university is like a challenge, every student must try really hard to pass the exam. Therefore, it would be better to make university a reward for only good students and this certainly would encourage all of those who want to enter the university to make a serious attempt to study.

On the other hand, our society needs not only professional lawyers, businessmen and accountants but we also need professional builders, workers and repairmen. Therefore, universities should have specific entrance requirements which only students of high quality could meet and for those who do not, they would find more suitable places at vocational schools or jobs training centers. Consequently, everyone would have the chance to archive knowledge that is the most compatible to their levels and the society would benefit as we have experts in every fields.

In conclusion, both students themselves and the society would benefit if university is only for good students.

Higher education should be available for good students only???

1. Agree. Because:
- Good students learn together -> Same level and good environment -> Maintain high quality of teaching

- Bad students not under pressure of keeping up with curriculum -> They can do what is the most suitable for them -> Get the best results

- Universities not cope with problem of massive quantity of students -> Equipment and infrastructure are sufficient for students who deserve them

2. Disagree. Because:
- Higher education provide with both knowledge and soft skills. If only good students are allowed in the universities
-> Good students only know how to compete, but do not know how to help the weak ones.
-> Bad students would lack soft skills

- Against the values of a fair society -> If giving bad student a chance, he can become a good one in the university

Essay: ( I choose disagree)

Some universities may face the dilemma of whether to be available for good students only or allow all of the students. Personally, I believe that higher education should be accessible to everyone.

To begin with, advanced education plays a key role in every student’s development. College is deemed a small society where students are offered opportunities to experience before entering real society. Granted, people go to college not only to accumulate knowledge but also to acquire understanding of interpersonal communication. If college is restricted to talented students only, they may always bear in mind that how to compete with others to prove their ability and forget thinking of how to help the weak ones. Besides, a large number of undesirable students would lack soft skills like communication skill, managing skill, which are not provided in any intensive training center or vocational school but the university.

A more essential factor why I advocate the argument is that it goes against the values of a fair society to not allow unfavorable students to higher education. Apparently, not having good results at high school does not avoid a bad performer from taking progress to become an outstanding one. It is well known fact that many talented people were not quite good students. If a bad student can find the passion and his strong point in the university, he would make every endeavor to achieve the goals.

In conclusion, talented students may have some strong suite but even unfavorable students should be allowed to universities.

Agree with : university for good students only

Because:
- University: To maintain reputation, universities produce professional lectures which require students have a good base knowledge => it’s only suitable for good students.
- For bad students: they will not suffer the pressure in professional training and rack his brain to remember things which they don’t understand.
- For good students: can easily accumulate all ideas of professor, and deeply research more related aspects of issues.
- For society: Almost organizations would like to receive effective labors trained carefully in universities and help them become the manager of company. Others with lower knowledge should be educated in vocational schools which are suitable for them, and help them achieve more opportunities in finding job => universities should not waste the finance course to educate bad students anymore.

Content:

In today’s rapidly developing society, the issue of beneficiary of university education system has aroused public concern. There have been several opinions on this topic, one typically suggest that everyone should have a right to apply for college or university he wants. However, prom my own perspective, only the best students should be able to get the higher education due to the reasons presented bellow.
To begin with, it is my belief that most university would like to maintain and enhance their reputation. That is the reason why they more and more produce professional lectures which require good base knowledge which only good students have. If you were a bad student, you would suffer the pressure in difficult training and rack your brain to remember things which you don’t understand. Meanwhile, good students could easily accumulate all ideas of professor, and deeply research more related aspects of issues.
In addition, the more society develops, the more education deeply specialized. Almost organizations would like to receive effective labors trained carefully in universities and help them become the manager of company. Others with lower knowledge should be educated in vocational schools which are suitable for them, and help them achieve more opportunities in finding job. So that universities should not waste the finance course to educate bad students anymore.
Summarizing, I am absolutely confident that it is of utmost importance to make higher ducation available for only good student, not only for all students. It will allow to everybody get necessary knowledge he needs to survive in the society.

University should be available to good students only.

YES :
- Society : Have high quality human resources
- Students : + motivate students learn more and more
+ make truly and deeply friendship
( because they often learn and work together )
- Teacher : have much inspiration to teach

NO :
- Society : unfair between people
( because how can you know the real ability of each student to evaluate that they are good or bad )
- Students : Have too much stress

Support the answer YES

In the fact that students have to take an exam and get a minimum scores required to get into the university; therefore, students had to learn very hard to archive their desired. That's the reason why I agree that university should be available to good students only.

The option of university should be available to good students only is attractive for several reasons. Firstly, learning in the class that everyone hard would motivate students learn more and more to improve their knowledge. Secondly, It's easy to make truly and deeply friendships because they often learn and work together for a long time. Thirdly, teacher would have much inspiration to teach because students are active, they always want to ask to improve their skills and knowledge.

On the other hand, I suppose that there is some beneficial for university should be available to all students. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of free and fair society to not permit students get into university by only based on scores. For example, a student have good ethic but not good in knowledge would absolutely not accept in university. Secondly, students would have stress in study, because they have to try too much to be the best student in class. Many students target the head, but in fact their achievement is second or third, so they feel very disappointed and get stress.

For the reasons mentioned below, It's seems to me that students are more active, more friendly and more successfully in their careers if the university should be available to good students only.

Outline :
- Agree with "Universities should be available to good students only"
+ Competitive learning environment -> emulate -> complete themselves
+ Teacher focus on teaching -> Produce high qualified people
+ -> Develop or build their country

- Disagree with "Universities should be available to good students only"
+ Bad students -> no train + no wide knowledge -> bad life
+ Destroy Human Right Law -> life isn't fair -> become bad people -> harmful to society

Essay : Disagree with "Universities should be available to good students only"

A right to education has been created and recognized by some jurisdictions since 1952. That's a reason why I believe that a colleague or university education should be available to all students.

On the one hand, the students who are not good students may not have wide knowledge and can't be trained to do the work properly. Thus, they would be difficult to find a good job or to solve the problems in their life. In my experience, the people who can't be trained at university often wouldn't do the job they want.

On the other hand, higher education be available to only good students would destroy the Human Right Law which guarantee the right to education. Granted, bad students would think the life isn't fair. Besides, they couldn't find a good job and they gradually feel tired. All of this would make them become bad people and harmful to society.

In conclusion, the right to education should be guaranteed. This means university should be available to all students.